Sociology 357: Methods of Sociological Inquiry

Lecture 1	Summer, 2013
Room 6112 Social Science	MTWR 10:20-12:00
Professor Jane Allyn Piliavin	Office Hours: MW 12:45-3:00 and by appointment
Phones: 262-4344(O), 513-5188(C)
Office: 2444 Social Science
EMAIL: jpiliavi@ssc.wisc.edu

Detailed schedule: We will meet M, T, W, R from July 1-August 9, with the exception of July 4. It is essential that you attend July 1-3 or you will be hopelessly behind.

This is a basic course in how to do social science research and how to evaluate the research of others. It assumes no background in research methods or statistics. It provides a general overview of the ways sociologists collect information about social phenomena with a special emphasis on what can be done to yield information that is trustworthy and useful for our theoretical understanding of social life. If you have had any other research methods courses you will probably find this course to be too elementary and should discuss alternatives with me.

There are several basic goals I hope to achieve in this course:

to introduce you to the elements of research design so that you will have a good foundation for future learning,
to teach you how to read a research report with a critical eye, so that you can know how trustworthy its information is,
to convince you that research is not an esoteric or arcane activity that can be performed only by slightly eccentric professors, but rather a relatively straightforward, systematic set of procedures by which you can get answers to questions you have,
to teach you the limitations and problems of doing research into human behavior and therefore the caution that is necessary in drawing broad conclusions on the basis of any one study, and
to show you that doing research can, indeed, even be fun, in the same way that learning about the world was fun for you before they spoiled it by making you do it in school.

Required Texts

There are two required texts for the basic course:

S Schutt, R.K. Investigating the Social World. 2009. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press, 6th edition (paper). A basic text in how to do social research. They are available quite reasonably on Amazon.com, both new and used, as well as at University Bookstore.
G Golden, M.P. The Research Experience. Itasca, Ill: F.E. Peacock, 1976. (paper) A collection of sociological research reports coupled with behind-the-scenes discussions of what really happened in the research. The articles are antiques; you will learn some 60's history as well. The book is no longer in print (although some used copies may be available on Amazon, etc.). Seven chapters will be on electronic reserve.

In addition, there are instructions for the exercises, and other illustrative materials, which you must print out from my website. Some other readings will be assigned on reserve in the social science reading room and/or on electronic reserve. These should all be indicated here, but there may be some glitches.

Requirements and Grading

Your grade is based principally on three data collection exercises : a field observation (15%), a small questionnaire (20%), and an experiment (20%), and on an article analysis (25%). Details on these four assignments are givenon the website. The last 20% of your grade is based on how much of the assigned homework you do (15%) and on your comments on the lectures and readings (5%).

The homework assignments are given in the syllabus. Homework will be skimmed and counted but not graded. The goal of assigning homework is that you will have done the assigned reading and thought about it before you come to class. Thus, it must be clear from what you write that you actually read the assigned material: vague comments that make no specific reference to the reading are not acceptable. To receive credit, the homework must be submitted at the beginning of class on the day it is due. If you omit no more than two of the 12 assignments, you will receive an A for the homework portion of your grade. If you do fewer than half of the assignments, you will receive an F. Between these extremes, you will receive a pro-rated grade. Late homework will be accepted for half credit only when there is clear justification, and even then, only at the next class meeting after the original due date. (Exceptions may be made for catastrophes.) Absence from class is not a sufficient justification for late homework; you may submit homework early in anticipation of an absence.

At the end of each Tuesday and Thursday class, I will collect "comment cards", on which you may ask general questions, make comments, and ask for clarifications regarding lectures and readings. Please purchase a package of 3 X 5 index cards for the purpose of writing the comments. I will not accept other sizes of cards or strips of paper. I will read these and may use them to structure later classes. Again, you will receive a grade based on how many cards with comments you turn in. Just a card with your name on it will not suffice; this is not just a sneaky way of taking attendance in lecture (although it does give me some information about that). I strongly suggest that you keep a journal of questions and comments as they occur to you as you read and as you sit in class (perhaps in a small notebook or pad). This can help you decide what to put on your comment cards; it can also serve as a record for you of what you have and haven't figured out, if you go back over it now and then. Do not use the cards to ask questions specific only to your article analysis or research projects. Ask those in office hours or after class.

I would like to stress that you can get an A for 20% of your grade simply by doing mechanical things having to do with comments and homework. This can make a big difference in your final grade.

There is a great deal of work to do in this course, and we have only six weeks. The subject matter requires an active rather than a passive stance toward learning. The way to learn research methods is to read real research reports and get your hands dirty doing real data collection. The homework is an integral part of the class, for it is the vehicle for learning to read a research report. All these activities take time and effort, but there are no shortcuts. I hope you will find at least some of what you do to be fun; at least you should not be able to complain that all you were asked to do was to spit back what the professor said.

In order to insure that students are paying attention in class, cell phones must be turned off and no laptops are to be used, unless we are doing things with data.

Procedural Matters

Class sessions will involve a mixture of lectures and discussion. Some classes will include discussion and workshop-type experiences. You are responsible for obtaining information you miss if you are absent. Please obtain the telephone numbers and e-mail addresses of several class members so you can call or e-mail them if you miss class. I believe it is inappropriate to use office hours (or telephone calls) to compensate for instruction you missed more or less by choice. But if you are attending regularly and making the effort to learn (or if your absence is for reasons beyond your control), I will do all that I can to help you. Past students have suggested that I stress that the absence of formal examinations on the assigned reading does not mean that you don't need to do it. Some report learning too late in the term that the assigned readings and our discussions of them help you do a better job on the graded exercises and article analysis.

When we are working on one of the exercises always bring the instructions for it to class. Many students find that it works well to have a looseleaf binder in which both the instructions and other notes may be kept. Or get one of those spirals with big pockets for other materials. It is also useful to bring Golden when readings have been assigned from it. I sometimes get behind, so if I haven't covered a Golden reading, please continue to bring the book to class until I do.

I have given you my home phone number, because I want you to feel free to call me when you have questions. BUT PLEASE TRY TO REMEMBER THAT WHEN YOU HAVE QUESTIONS IS WHEN OTHERS DO TOO -- WHEN PROJECTS ARE DUE. Try to realize that I have another life and be considerate. For example, when writing up an exercise, please work all the way through the exercise, noting questions you have as you go. Then make ONE phone call to try to get the answers, rather than making a new call every time you get stumped!

SCHEDULE

The exact pacing of topics from day to day will depend upon the flow of the class. HOMEWORK AND PROJECT DUE DATES GIVEN IN THE SYLLABUS ARE CORRECT, even if I do not remind you in class, unless a WRITTEN note on the blackboard or an e-mail message alters them. You are expected to check your e-mail; if you have not activated your account, please do so.

S refers to readings in the Schutt methods book. For example, S 7 refers to all of Schutt, Chapter 7. S, pp 100-105 means pages 100-105 only. G refers to readings in the Golden reader. The articles will be indicated by the author's name, e.g. G: Humphreys. In Golden, always read both the research report and the personal journal that follows it. There is a lot of material in the personal journals that will help you with your exercises; do not neglect them. Some of them are even entertaining.

NOTE: A * BEFORE A DATE MEANS THERE IS SOMETHING DUE THAT DAY, not always to turn in.

The readings are given class by class. You should have read the material indicated or done the homework by the date shown. Deadlines for all assignments are indicated on the schedule.

Date	Subjects, Readings, and Homework
Week 1: July 1 M	First Class. The usual introductory remarks. How to think like a social scientist. Begin Systematic Observation and Field Research. I will present the instructions for the observation exercise (15% of your grade) and give examples of what you might want to observe. Today you will form two-person groups for the observation exercise. Decide with your partner on the setting you will use for your observation. Between now and Wednesday, July 3, do your unstructured observations. Do not observe a one-time event; you will return for a second round this weekend.
* 2 T	Read S 9. Read excerpt on reserve on crack research and the selections from Bosk, Forgive and Remember, and Duneier, Sidewalk, on doing field work. Ethics of Research. Matters of ethics come up in all research but are especially acute in participant observation. Read S 3 (pp 67-88). Also go to and read the following website: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/belmont.html Read G: Humphreys "Tearoom Trade" and "Methods". HOMEWORK #1: Discuss the methods of observation used by Humphreys. Would you call this participant or non-participant observation? Overt or covert? What methods in addition to observation did he use in this article? Briefly give your opinion of the ethics of the research reported in Humphreys' article. We will hold a debate in class.
* 3 W	READ S 1, 2 (all), 4 (pages 100-115), 6(190-202). Discussion of research design, propositions, concepts, variables, and operational definitions. Process of research. HOMEWORK #2: Turn in xerox copy of rough notes from unstructured observation. Bring the original to class. You will need it for the WORKSHOP on interpreting unstructured observations and developing a hypothesis and structured observation design. You should now be ready to do your structured observation.
4 R	Happy fourth of July! No class, of course.
Week 2: *8 M	Introduction of Article Analysis as the overall framework for the course. It is strongly recommended that you have an approved article by July 16. This will be explained in class. Analyzing Observational Data. Read S 14, writing a research report (pp. 486-525), skimming section on variance); S 15, (pp. 548-555). Discussion of observation exercise with emphasis on how you write up a research report and how you prepare a statistical table to summarize your results. You should have your structured data collection completed and your data with you. WORKSHOP on data analysis and writeup of observation exercise.
*9 T	Lab sessions for hands on work with SPSS. In Microlab, 3218 Sewell Social Science Building. By today your observation report should be written up to the section on results. You should have your data collection completed and your data with you. I will stay in the lab as long as we are allowed and will be available after lab in my office as late as I am needed to help you with your data analyses
*10 W	Applying the basic concepts. Read G: Doob and Gross, "Status of Frustrator as an Inhibitor of Horn-honking Responses," and "How I Did It" HOMEWORK #3: Give the major independent and dependent variables in the Doob and Gross article; tell how each was measured (operationalized). State the major theoretical hypothesis of the research and the operational hypothesis that flows from it. See if you can construct the logical framework leading from the theory to the specific prediction. (Hint: This involves the "frustration-aggression hypothesis," the theoretical hypothesis, and the measurement assumptions, and it is not obvious.) Be prepared to discuss the results of this research, in terms of what it demonstrates (I never say "proves"). Questions about write-up of Observation Exercise.
* 11 R	Begin surveys and index construction. Read S 3 ( pp. 117-130). S 8, Surveys (all). Start thinking about a topic for the questionnaire. I will lecture on particular types of question format. QUESTIONNAIRE EXERCISE DISCUSSED. Read Newman questionnaire as a NEGATIVE example: how NOT to write questions. This fake questionnaire was devised as a teaching tool to illustrate common mistakes made in writing questions. Pick out your two favorite lousy questions; I will discuss what makes a bad question. I will also give hints on writing good questions. Form groups for questionnaire exercise; begin to write questions to be completed over the weekend and turned in on Wednesday, July 10 at class time. OBSERVATION EXERCISE is due today, July11. (If necessary you may have until Friday at 4:30. But don't let it interfere with writing questions.)
Week 3: *15 M	HOMEWORK #4: Drafts of questions due at class time, with a definition of your concept and its dimensions. Make sure all questions from your group are handed in together, even if you wrote them separately. Sampling. Read S 5, Sampling. I will lecture on sampling.
*16 T	Read G: Ransford, "Isolation, Powerlessness, and Violence," and the personal journal. HOMEWORK #5: Identify the major variables and how they were operationalized -- that is, what were the questions used to get at the ideas he was interested in, Add any comments you have about the subject matter or process of his research. We will discuss this article in detail in class. Your questions returned with comments.There will be some time at the end of class for group work to begin revisions Your articles for the article analysis should have been turned in by now for my approval.
*17 W	Read S 4, (pp.130-142). The idea of construct validity. Read G: Rubin "Measurement of Romantic Love" and journal. HOMEWORK #6: Explain in your own words the relation between what Rubin is doing and the ideas of validity explained in your text. List three findings in his article that support the claim that his measure of "love" is valid. Comment very briefly on your feelings about this approach to measuring love. Clarifications of what is wanted in the Questionnaire Exercise. Approved articles returned. Turn in your revised questionnaires at class time.
*18 R	Read "External Validity" section of Article Analysis in preparation for homework described below. We will discuss it in class today.HOMEWORK #7: Apply article analysis section B: External Validity to the Ransford, the Humphreys, the Doob and Gross article, or your own approved article. If you choose to do an analysis of your own article,If you choose to do an analysis of your own article, you will receive feedback on it from the reader, which should help you do a better job on your final article analysis. (You need to keep one copy of your article and turn one in, with your name on it, with the analysis, which must be typed. A reader willl give you feedback and return your analysis, but not our copy of the article.) See example article analysis here . Your question drafts returned with final comments. Some time at end of class will be left for groups to consult on these corrections. After you correct them, your questionnaire should be ready for the field, and you should begin collecting data. At least half of the data should be collected by next Monday, July 22.
Week 4: * 22 M	Read Section C: Construct Validity of Measures of Variables in Article Analysis. HOMEWORK #8: Apply Section C of the Article Analysis to either the Doob and Gross, the Ransford or your own article. Again, if you use your own article, you will receive comments on it. Discussion of this section of the article analysis as it relates not only to these articles but also to the questionnaire exercise. Workshop on making a code book, open-end coding and rostering of data. AT LEAST HALF OF YOUR DATA SHOULD BE COLLECTED BY NOW. BRING ALL DATA YOU HAVE TO CLASS. By now, you should have written a draft of the questionnaire exercise up to where the data analysis section begins, to save yourself time later. Meet with your groups on last minute work and with me on questions about your data sheets.
*23 T	Lab sessions in Microlab for data entry and initial analysis of questionnaire data. You should have all of your data collected by now. Again, I will stay as long as allowed in the lab or in office hours to help you. HOMEWORK #9 >>> SUBMIT COPIES OF YOUR DATA SHEETS AND CODE BOOKS AND information on location and name of your SPSS data file, syntax file, and output file with your frequency distributions before 4:30 P.M. today in my office or mailbox.
* 24 W	Read Experiment Exercise. Begin discussing experimental design. Read S 7, Experiments (pp. 221-237); G : Darley and Batson, "From Jerusalem to Jericho" and the personal journal. Ignore the material on measures of religiosity (pp. 200-202). HOMEWORK #10: Identify the independent and dependent variables and tell how each was measured; Summarize the key findings. Focus on finding the relevant numbers, not just the words. What procedures were used to ensure internal validity of the findings, in terms of the logic of experiments? (Note: Although it does not say so explicitly, this is a randomized experiment.) Be prepared to discuss anything else that seems relevant. Bring your ideas for experiments to class. There will be an experimental design workshop. You should then begin collecting data.
25 R	Reread S 14 (pp.486-524) Carefully read the example of a student project in the Questionnaire Exercise writeup. I will hand out computer output that corresponds to the example, and I will discuss it. Computer analysis of questionnaire data returned. WORKSHOP on interpreting and reporting results. I will be available today after regular office hours, for consultation. If you want reanalyses, you must request them by this afternoon.
26 F	I will have office hours for as much of the day as you need to help you with questions about data analysis, interpretation and report write-up.
Week 5: *29 M	QUESTIONNAIRE EXERCISE DUE today, at CLASS TIME. Lecture and discussion on internal validity: How can you support a judgment that A is a cause of B? (As contrasted with B causing A, or other possibilities.) Campbell & Stanley pre-, true, and quasi - experimental designs. Read S 7 (pp. 237-249); S 6 (pp. 202-216); Stern, Chapter 3 (electronic reserve). Read Article Exercise Section D: Internal Validity; S, Appendix C, How to read a research article. Read article "Divorce among sociologists married to sociologists" and the student analysis of it. (The analysis precedes the article.) We do not have time for me to give you feedback on your own article on this section. Discussion of threats to internal validity as they relate to the experiment exercise.
* 30 T	Read G: Goldberg, "Misogyny and the College Girl," and the personal journal. HOMEWORK #11: Identify the independent and dependent variables and tell how each was measured, Summarize the key findings, again focusing on finding the relevant numbers. What procedures were used to ensure internal validity in this research? How is the design of this experiment different from that of the Darley and Batson study? You should have a draft of the entire experiment report written up to the data analysis by now, and have half or more of your data collected.
31 W	Continue discussion of experiments, causation, Experiment Exercise. Data analysis and report write-up WORKSHOP today.
*Aug 1, R	Labs on analyzing experimental data. You know how to roster data by now. But we can go over appropriate statistical techniques for your data. Ideally you will have all of your data by now.
Week 6: *5 M	S 14, 525-533; read Babbie chapter,"The Elaboration model". (Electronic Reserves ). Discussion of internal validity in connection with elaboration model. Questions about anything. Discussion of the elaboration model, third-variable analysis, and internal-external validity issues as they relate to your article analysis. EXPERIMENT EXERCISE DUE today, at class time.
*6 T	Field experiments have more external validity but more complex internal validity problems. Read G: Goldstein and Arms, "Effects of Observing Athletic Contests on Hostility," and the personal journal. HOMEWORK #12: Identify the independent and dependent variables and tell what procedures were used to insure internal validity.
7 W	Further discussion of elaboration model; some discussion of regression. Questions about article analysis. Course evaluation.
8 R	END OF SEMESTER PARTY AND MINI-CONVENTION. Experiments returned. Reports on what you found in your experiments. Discussion of final grade based on computer projections. Attendance is required today. I will bring refreshments and I urge you to do the same.
	I will have extended office hours the week of August 6 for questions concerning your article analyses.
	ARTICLE ANALYSIS DUE Monday, August 12

If you need an extension on this time, I will be happy to negotiate it, but understand that it might lead to your getting an incomplete temporarily.

Top

Questions? Comments? Please contact jpiliavi @ssc.wisc.edu