Wisconsin Unemployment Rate Forecast

T. Haavelmo Professor

This memo reports a 12-month forecast for the seasonally adjusted Wisconsin unemployment rate. In addition to point forecasts (the expected future value of the unemployment rate), the memo also reports 50% and 80% forecast intervals (probable ranges for future values).

The unemployment rate in April 2011 was 7.3%, dropping slightly from 7.4% in March, following a steady fall during 2010.

The forecasts are summarized in Figure 1 and Table 1. The point forecast is for the unemployment rate to decline slowly later this year, dropping to 6.7% by November of 2012. The 80% forecast intervals show that there is considerable additional uncertainty. In particular, there is a possibility that the unemployment rate will increase slightly at the end of 2012. There is also a significant probability that the unemployment rate will continue to fall, as low as 5.5% by April of 2012. The 50% forecast intervals refine this uncertainty, showing that it is most likely that the unemployment rate will fall to at most 7.1% by September, and can easily fall to 5.7% by April of 2012.

A 50% forecast interval is designed to contain the future unemployment rate with 50% probability. It is just as likely for the rate to fall in this interval as out of it. This is the smallest possible interval which has even odds of containing the future rate. We can think of this interval as “likely” to contain the future rate.

An 80% forecast interval is designed to contain the future unemployment rate with 80% probability. We can think of this interval as “highly likely” to contain the future rate. The 80% interval is designed so that there is a 10% chance that the future value will be smaller than the forecast interval, and a 10% chance that the future value will be larger than the forecast interval.

Figure 1: Wisconsin Unemployment Rate Forecasts

TABLE 1: Wisconsin Unemployment Rate Forecasts

	History	Point Forecast	50% Interval Forecast	80% Interval Forecast



2010: 9	7.9%
2010:10	7.7%
2010:11	7.6%
2010:12	7.5%
2011:1	7.4%
2011:2	7.5%
2011:3	7.4%
2011:4	7.3%
2011:5		7.2%	(7.1%, 7.3%)	(7.1%, 7.3%)
2011:6		7.2%	(7.0%, 7.2%)	(7.0%, 7.3%)
2011:7		7.1%	(6.8%, 7.2%)	(6.7%, 7.4%)
2011:8		7.0%	(6.6%, 7.2%)	(6.5%, 7.4%)
2011:9		6.9%	(6.4%, 7.1%)	(6.3%, 7.3%)
2011:10		6.8%	(6.3%, 7.1%)	(6.2%, 7.4%)
2011:11		6.7%	(6.2%, 7.1%)	(6.0%, 7.4%)
2011:12		6.7%	(6.1%, 7.1%)	(5.9%, 7.5%)
2012:1		6.7%	(6.0%, 7.1%)	(5.8%, 7.6%)
2012:2		6.6%	(5.9%, 7.1%)	(5.7%, 7.7%)
2012:3		6.6%	(5.8%, 7.1%)	(5.6%, 7.7%)
2012:4		6.6%	(5.7%, 7.1%)	(5.5%, 7.8%)